What Is an Action Priority Matrix?
Bradford R. GlaserAn Action Priority Matrix is a simple tool that helps you sort through all your tasks. You do this by comparing how much work each task takes against how much it will actually help you. This way, you can see which tasks are actually worth your time. This method helps you make decisions fast without spending time going back and forth about what to work on next. This framework came from productivity books in the late 1900s and became popular through resources like MindTools.
So many of our big plans get stuck on unimportant tasks while the most valuable opportunities just sit there waiting. The matrix answers this by making you look at each task in two simple ways before you spend your time and energy on it. When you check your tasks this way, you don't have to guess anymore about what's worth doing.
Most people at work spend hours every day on tasks that seem useful but don't actually accomplish much. Your energy gets spread across these different items you think you need to work on. The matrix helps you see which tasks actually deserve your time and effort. Then, you can give the other tasks to someone else or just skip them altogether.
You can put your tasks into four different groups to take those endless to-do lists and turn them into simple plans where you know what to work on first.
- Balance matrix management skills
- Drive successful influence and collaboration
- Become a successful matrix manager
Table of Contents
How the Matrix Works for You
Most people naturally go for either the easy option or the big payoff when they have to make decisions. The matrix makes you think about both of these factors at the same time – so you end up looking at quick wins and the gains you'll see down the road. This two-sided strategy helps you stay away from the common mistake where you only work on the easy tasks and never actually get around to tackling the bigger work that takes more time and effort.
When teams actually sit down and prioritize their work formally, they get much better results. Studies have found that completion rates increase a lot when organizations start working with these kinds of priority systems. The UK's Government Digital Service is a great example – they saved hundreds of hours when they rolled out this way of working across their development teams. This organized prioritization actually changes how teams work day-to-day. Projects get done faster when everyone on the team knows which tasks they should work on first. Your deadlines also become much easier to predict when you stop jumping back and forth between whatever feels urgent at the moment.
What really sets this apart from other planning tools is that it makes you think about long-term value. Most traditional methods push you toward whatever seems the most pressing right then. The matrix helps you take a step back and ask yourself if that urgent work is actually going to make a real difference. The truth is that most urgent tasks just go away on their own if you wait a day or two.
There's one big catch you need to watch out for. When you're mapping out your work, you need to be honest with yourself about how much time and resources each item is actually going to need. If you're bad at estimating, your whole prioritization system falls apart before you even get started.
Say you set aside three hours for a project that actually needs eight hours, and then you blame the framework when you miss your deadlines. Your whole system stops working when you keep underestimating the size of projects.
How Each Quadrant Works
The Action Priority Matrix breaks down into four different quadrants that each serve a different role in your workflow. I've found that most people skip over this part. Let's go through them one by one so you can see how they actually work in practice.
Quick Wins are tasks where you get high results without much effort. These are the tasks that give you the most results for the least amount of work. Think of a software company that discovers a small API change that could make its system run 30% better with just two hours of work. That's what a Quick Win looks like. When you finish these tasks, you build momentum fast and free up mental energy for harder decisions.
Big Projects sit in that space where you make a big difference, but they also need high effort. These are your major projects that matter a lot but take a lot of time and resources. The same tech startup would see a full API rebuild as a Big Project since it brings a lot of value but takes weeks of careful planning. These projects need careful planning because they use up a lot of resources.
Moving on to Fill-Ins, these are your low-results and low-effort tasks. These won't change everything, but they're quick to finish when you have some spare time. You can use these to fill gaps between bigger work sessions. Fill-Ins help you turn dead time into at least somewhat productive time.
Thankless Tasks create the most frustration because they take a lot of effort but don't give you much back. People fool themselves here, though. Just because a task feels like the right move doesn't make it worth doing. That long report nobody reads? It may feel important, but it's just a Thankless Task disguised as real work. These tasks drain your energy without helping you move forward.
The main question to ask yourself is what actually counts as high results in your own situation. Context matters more than you might think when you're figuring out where to put each task in the matrix.
How to Use the Matrix Method
The best way to get started is to grab yourself a blank matrix and then go through each of the five steps. First, list out all your tasks and rate each one for how much difference it makes and effort on a scale from zero to ten. These numbers make it much easier to figure out where to put each item when you get to that step.
Next, you'll move on to the visual part, where you actually place each item on your matrix. Tasks with high value and low effort go in the Quick Wins quadrant. Big Projects are the ones that make a difference but also need high effort. Fill-ins are low value, low effort, while Thankless Tasks are low value, high effort. The visual layout lets you see your workload balance immediately. You can see when you have too many tasks bunched up in one quadrant. This tells you if you're doing too much busy work or maybe putting off harder projects that would help you reach your goals.
Here's where I see people go wrong most of the time. They'll write down something vague like "finish the project" instead of "finish budget analysis for Q3 proposal." Being specific matters more than you might think. You need to break big projects down into specific actions, or you'll have a hard time scoring them right.
Before you score how much difference a job makes, think about what's behind your number. Will this job actually move your work forward, or does it just feel like it matters? Your gut feeling isn't always right here. Scoring the value right is what determines if you spend time on tasks that actually matter.
The matrix works best when you check it every week. Tasks move between quadrants as deadlines get closer or what matters most changes. Pick a time each week to review your scores and move tasks around as needed.
How Different Industries Use the Matrix
Different industries use the Action Priority Matrix in different ways. What works for a tech startup might not make sense for a hospital or nonprofit organization. Your particular context shapes everything when you use this tool.
Let me give you an example. A university fundraising team found that their Quick Win was something easy – they updated their online donation forms. This little change made a big difference without much effort. At the same time, NASA treats something like Mars mission parts as Major Projects because the stakes are very high, and the work takes years to finish.
These sector-specific wins change how you tackle your everyday work. Your industry's constraints become much clearer when you see how other fields manage similar challenges.
You have to think about your own field's quirks when you use this matrix. Healthcare teams work with strict regulations that can make easy tasks feel much harder than they actually are. Nonprofit organizations have to think about volunteer capacity when they figure out what counts as low-effort work versus high-effort work.
The biggest question you should ask yourself is where your hidden Quick Wins are. You probably have tasks sitting right in front of you that could deliver great results without requiring much work.
Your Quick Wins live in the spaces between your everyday routines. Most teams miss these opportunities because they're too focused on bigger challenges.
One mistake I've seen people make is assuming that impact metrics work the same way across different fields. A marketing campaign's success looks completely different from a software development sprint's success. Each sector has its own way of measuring what really matters. The numbers tell different stories depending on your field.
Other Tools and Digital Options
The Action Priority Matrix works really well when you use it alongside some of the other frameworks out there. Each of these different approaches looks at prioritization from a slightly different angle, and teams usually do better when they can switch between them as their project needs start to change. The Eisenhower Matrix is all about urgency versus importance, while MoSCoW breaks tasks down into must-have or nice-to-have features.
When you have multiple frameworks to choose from, you have options when one of them stops working in your situation. Your team's stress levels usually drop when they can pick the right tool for whatever situation they're in. Deadlines don't feel as scary when you can match your way of doing stuff to whatever you're dealing with at the time.
Modern tools like Miro and Monday.com have changed how teams use these matrices. These tools come with interactive templates that let everyone work together in real time, and they have automated scoring systems built right in. You can drag and drop your tasks around, give them effort scores from zero to ten, and then watch as the matrix updates itself automatically. Most teams will tell you this works way better than sticky notes on whiteboards.
There's some real psychology here, too – when your team members can see their work laid out on a colorful grid, they're much more likely to get on board with the whole process. It makes those abstract priorities feel more concrete and something everyone can understand.
But here's the issue – tool fatigue can become a real problem when teams keep jumping between different tools. You'll also need to think about data privacy when all your work lists are sitting in the cloud. Some of the newer tools will even give you AI-driven suggestions that can re-categorize your tasks as conditions change, though you can't always count on this automation to get it right. These algorithms still usually miss most of the context that any human would naturally pick up on.
The big question you need to ask yourself is when to switch from one framework to another. When you're in crisis mode, you might need to put urgency ahead of long-term value. Strategic planning usually works better for the bigger-picture perspective you get from looking at value versus effort.
Whatever phase your project is in will help you figure out which way is going to work best. Teams that manage this transition right keep moving forward at a steady pace, while the ones that don't manage it well usually end up stuck, spending way too much time thinking about it all instead of doing the work.
Build Strong Prioritization Skills for Your Team
The Action Priority Matrix really helps when you step back and see how it changes your daily work. Instead of feeling overwhelmed, you'll start to see patterns become obvious right away. I've watched plenty of teams use this tool, and it gives them a shared language around what matters. When everyone on your team understands the difference between Quick Wins and Big Projects, you stop having those tiring conversations where one person thinks something needs to be done now while another person sees it as a waste of time.
The matrix becomes a neutral referee that settles disputes and keeps everyone moving in the same direction. This cuts down on stress and makes teamwork better in ways you might not expect when you first start. Your regular meetings become shorter and stay more focused than they were before. The most successful teams I've seen are the ones that make the matrix a normal part of how they work instead of something they do just once. They go back to their quadrants regularly and adjust priorities when new situations come up. They're not afraid to move tasks from one category to another as they learn what actually matters.
Teams that get comfortable with this way of working see real improvements within just a few weeks. Their stress levels go down because everyone knows what they need to work on next. Their project completion rates increase because they stop chasing activities that don't matter much. Their collaboration gets smoother because arguments about priorities become rare. With that in mind, these kinds of prioritization skills are especially valuable for supervisors who need to guide their teams through competing needs and changing priorities.
The ability to keep your team focused on top priorities while maintaining morale and productivity is one of the most worthwhile leadership skills you can develop. It's something that gets better with structured development and practice.
If you want to strengthen these capabilities within your organization, at HRDQ, we have resources specifically designed to help supervisors get better at priority management and team leadership. You can get started with Matrix Manager Inventory, an assessment-based program that helps new and seasoned learners master Matrix Management.
